Comments

wrote:
Umm...how come everyone is ignoring the most intriging(sp) aspect of this picture: The really wierd ghost boy painted by the window!
wrote:
Ryan Pace
wrote:
this is a sick picture
wrote:
thanks mr motts for very interesting gallery and anouther place to visit for ghostly activity it is going to be great to investigate.
wrote:
hay this is a really great place i would love to spend like three to four days to investagate for ghosts. i think that would be so increitable.
wrote:
likesssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wrote:
have you noticed that all of opacity's photo sets were taken in 2005...it seems like every photo set was taken in 2005.....i quess opacity never takes any other pics in other years...2006/2007/2008>??
wrote:
as anyone else noticed that opacity claims that this place was renovated or destoryed in 2002...and that opacity calims to have takent the pictures in 2005...
wrote:
Yay! I had not been here in a while, and it is good to be back. Great gallery!
wrote:
Happy trails...ergh.

Also I agree with ginberry. :)
wrote:
No soap dispenser jokes? :( Been a long time since I've been here, I'm guessing most of the old regulars are gone...
wrote:
Fabulous colors!
wrote:
The Room that your in in this pic is now completely destroyed. The 2nd floor caved into the 1st floor, and there is no roof. I have vids, as well as a pic of a ghost staring at me through a window if anyone wonts to see it. Motts?
wrote:
"Defenestrated" is one of my favorite words. Usually difficult to find a time or occasion to use it, though. Five points!
wrote:
Great lighting on this one.