2 Comments Posted by Seymour

wrote:
To say the state has nothing to do with this makes no sense at all. Who do you think owns the place? Only a government would waste money on a project like this. Private organizations don't waste money on destroying structures without a plan to rebuild or utilize the land for a profitable purpose. The abandoned structures should remain because it makes no economic sense to tear them down to only leave an eyesore of rubble like they did with the last buildings they tore down.
wrote:
@ DEMO DUDE
I drive past these structures quite often, and it is sad to see them being torn down. What a waste of money taking these buildings down. The job was never finished with the other sets of buildings that were taken down years ago. The sites are piles of rubble, the job never completed. They would be better off leaving the structures as they stand rather than leaving a pile of rubble. At least the ghost buildings have great beauty to them. The state complains they have no money and they waste it on a project that adds no value at all. A complete money pit and waste of resources.