3,181 Comments Posted by Lynne

wrote:
Stunning!
wrote:
Dang, that's nice architecture!
wrote:
Yeah, well, welcome back - you've been sorely missed. :-)
wrote:
**** =8-o ****
wrote:
Sorry - giggling too hard to answer . . . . . .
wrote:
At a tuberculosis sanitarium??!!??!! My goodness.
wrote:
No sharp edges, nothing to kill yourself with/on, difficult to catch on fire, they can be peed on and wiped off easily, and (actually, Zebra) they ARE too damn difficult to pick up and hit anyone with. And if you did, you would have a hernia the same time you smacked someone else, so it would at least be a draw. :-)
wrote:
Shaniqua,

Are you asking God to bless our souls BEFORE or AFTER we are sent to hell? Seems like a bit of a waste to bless us if we are already damned, doesn't it?
wrote:
I was thinking of you!
~~No static at all~~
:-)
wrote:
"Dreary asylum" my aching hindquarters! >:-[

Here is a link to the article, and there is a slideshow with it. However, if you are a Danvers Hospital fan, the slideshow is quite painful:

http://www.boston.com/...urious_homes?mode=PF

Well, dangit! I got to the site quickly and easily when I first went looking for this, but now when I go back it wants you to register before it will let you view the article. >:-[
wrote:
Oh yes - it's kin to the "catapulting urological table of doom" with optional copper pipes. =8-o

http://www.opacity.us/...co_urology_table.htm
wrote:
Isn't that the dangedest thing? What a weird place for a clock like that!
wrote:
Hey, Jmack! Haven't seen you in a while!

Dang, for an ugly old machine that hair dryer goes for a high price, no?
wrote:
wrote:
Was Wendell Hunt the Superintendent when you were there? I used to work with him in Indiana - a really nice guy.