462 Comments for Sanitarium Joseph Lemaire

wrote:
Motts I know you may not look at these comments much, but if you do. There's someone else with a site similar to yours who managed to photograph this building before renovations started. It seems it's only been in the last 9 years or so that graffiti has happened. I won't mention the name of the site but it's quite an obvious one, just google abandoned places. If you wanted to see the difference, or for anyone really. It's neat to see your photos and then his.
wrote:
I am sorry Josh, but I can´t see ANY kind of art on this wall.......
wrote:
ALL these buildings were Beautiful back in their day, and even now in their time of stress and decay....they are still Beautiful!!!
wrote:
Wow this is a great photo :) it emphasises the vibrant history of this building. the contrast of the fresh evergreens to the aging abandoned building really adds to the eeireness of it
wrote:
The people who damaged this building need to spend the time finding a job !
wrote:
Yeh, guess I have to get in (the extremely long) line of admirers and just.....' admire'.....
nice nice nice
wrote:
cute pix of you,your adorable motts,keep up the awesome work man! :<)
wrote:
The glass circles are now missing - If this is the place I'm thinking, there's further stairs going back, on the left and right? I was here in June 2008 and it looked more trashed. Shame really, such beautiful Art Deco should be kept.
wrote:
oh my goodness. hah
wrote:
i'm amused by the fact that he's trying very hard to not touch anything if he doesn't need to- the hovering crouch, the crossed arms...
wrote:
Such a shame. Why do people destry things like this?
Andy, thanks for the pics!
wrote:
Motts, i find the pictures with you in them very intresting, they never really give a full view of the photographer himself! very mysterious
wrote:
my momma! that is what i call art work
wrote:
Oh Does little Mr. Motts have to take a break. Just kidding
wrote:
This is nice.How did you take it?