Where was the ward located? For some reason they always seem to put the violent ward farthest away from whe center of the building. At Danvers, the violent wards, were on the third floor in the A and J building. So if the ward is as far away from the center of a Kirkbride style building, as you can get, it's the violent ward. Guaranteed to be a major hike when a general help call is made.
Yes, usually a staff person would supervise the entire cafeteria from up there, not only to watch for possible choking , but to watch for any disturbances: fights, stealing, etc. There'd be staff at the tables too, but of course the views were more obstructed "on the floor".
maybe it's not a lack of empathy. maybe it's more that these are places that those with an interest might otherwise never get to see. i personally think motts photographs in an extremely emotional way, which is dispassionate and personal at the same time. i haven't explained that very well...um...i think what i'm trying to say is that everyone's response is valid to them. appreciation is a personal thing - what you "get", someone else may not - it doesn't mean they're not thinking, it just means they're not writing it down.
haunting.
what bothers me more than the despair and decay (both of the buildings and the lives they housed) is the mindset of people who describe viewing these sorts of environments as "orgasmic" (not seen in this msg section but just as a result of browsing)
i wonder if they ever think about what theyre seeing above and beyond the spectacular photography.
the only conclusion that i can draw is that theyre 13 and not yet equipped with the ability to empathise or imagine.
I drive by those buildings every day. The cops sit out front every day. Nothing changes. I keep hearing of imminent demolition, but it never comes. As with Byberry and other places, I think there are three major holdups:
Asbestos, asbestos, and asbestos. The mesiothelioma ambulance chasers wait with baited breath!