3,485 Comments for Philadelphia State Hospital (Byberry)

wrote:
Oh, definitely! Without a doubt! Probably the most credible story I have seen yet about this place! That is absolutely true and you can take that one to the bank!

Well, maybe the eye bank . . . . .

=8-o

As far as people mating with animals, well, we do happen to have an expert on that who writes in to this very site, if he's not too shy to tell us about it. :-)
wrote:
Is it true that they took this guys eye out and put a camera in ther to see if he could see? My friend went there and got records from patients in there. He even said that they tried to mate the people with animals. I've been really interested in this place since he told me, too bad they are wrecking it.
wrote:
Man oh man. I learned something new today.

I never knew Marshall was a manufacturer of any thing else except musical equipment.
wrote:
What I've noticed is that even though people destroy walls, floors, ceilings, etc; they still have the common decency to leave some remenants of the building intact. I.E., signs, medical equipment, etc.
wrote:
War is a great way to describe it. It actually looks like post World War II.
wrote:
I love Byberry. Byberrian for life. The pics are awesome.
wrote:
i went to byberry for the first time lastnight me and abuddy it sucked we searched for 3 hours looking for this morgue can someone tell me were the good shit is
wrote:
wat building is the mourge in?
wrote:
How many photos you have on this site, Motts? We know they're all yours. Why the hell would you steal one photo when you've probably got thousands to choose from? Does anyone realize NoX is in the word obnoxious? I like YOUR color version, too, Motts!
wrote:
What drives people to pull petty, immature crap like that? It could be jealousy, like jo said...no matter what the reason, though, the little twerp can't prove a thing, because this "NoX" idjit didn't take the pic, Motts did.
wrote:
People without talent are always trying to say that something was stolen from them. I'd say just consider it a sign that you're really talented, and ignore the little fucker. BTW, I looked @ the color shot, and it rocks too! Have you ever taken a bad picture? :)
wrote:
Motts, he's just jelous.
wrote:
Mr. Motts, No need to explain, we know your work!! Ed from Oregon
wrote:
Yeah, it's a pretty unfounded accusation. I wouldn't give it a second thought.
wrote:
To whom it may concern,

I've gotten an email claiming this photo is someone else's, this "NoX" person...

I don't know why these claims are being made, but every photo in the galleries on this site were taken by myself, with the exception of Drew's Northampton morgue shot, which was credited and given permission to use.

This accusation is incredulous and false. I have the high resolution file, with the time, date, camera make and model, as well as four witnesses who were with me that day. Why would I steal one shot from someone else?

I have a color version with EXIF data embedded in: http://www.opacity.us/...ent/byberry_exif.jpg

If you want to press a lawsuit, bring it on dude. Otherwise, you're a sorry excuse for a person to try and pull this shit. Have a nice day.