Comments

wrote:
it might have been for the dentist.
wrote:
demolition i believe is scheduled for january. does anyone know what developer purchased the land to build on? thanks - any info is greatly appreciated.
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE AN ARTIST REPRODUCE THIS AS A PAINTING. I CAN ALSO IMAGINE THIS IN TIME LAPSE PHOTOGRAPHY. ANOTHER CLASSIC, MOTTS.
wrote:
The power is left on to prevent 'street miners' from stripping the place of copper. As for the life of these bulbs, if you have a high quality bulb and a good industrial ballast you can gets YEARS from a bulb. The store I manage still has almost 90% tubes from when the store was built 10 years ago, whereas the 40 or so halogen Par3 50 watt lamps have been replaced 4 times over during that same time.
wrote:
A. Mom,

True, isolation from those who care the most is a manifestation of the illness. I was married to a Bi-Polar, and know all too well. Imagine the Motts of the future taking shots of our current facilities. Will the future Motts be similarly appalled by our current lack of knowledge concerning mental illness? Do you think locking the mentally ill, and homeless into an institution would make them any happier? Warmer and fuller perhaps, but happier? I would have loved to cram lithium and prozac into my ex but that's obviously not what she wanted. After 7 years of near homelessness It seems she may be on an upswing, I bid her the best but until she accepts the medicine herself there is nothing anyone can do.
wrote:
this stuff in there almost reminded me of one flew over the cuckoos nest it was crazy
wrote:
ill second the grey skies, very calming. Absolutely beautiful shot
wrote:
it looks like a bobbin of thread on it, I dont even want to know why they would need to *thread* anything , lol
wrote:
Motts, this is wonderful news !!! I cant wait
wrote:
Now Tony, are you gently suggesting I wrote this? ;-)
wrote:
It's a piece of HOBART food prep equiptment
wrote:
Ha! Good point!
wrote:
Yahoo! I've been waiting since 5/24/05 to hear this! :-)
wrote:
Owwwwwwwww!!!!!! 8`-(
wrote:
Here I am, I'm in Google looking for something (that I can't find) and all I got on my mind is that picture. (LOL) Soooo, back to Opacity to get the pic and blow it up. Well, I quickly saw that the top word is 'wave', not 'have'. The bottom word is still a problem. Enlarged it looked more like 'twirn'. Now it even makes ~less~ sence. (LOL)