Comments

wrote:
What I've noticed is that even though people destroy walls, floors, ceilings, etc; they still have the common decency to leave some remenants of the building intact. I.E., signs, medical equipment, etc.
wrote:
It hurts... it hurts so much to read!!! Why oh why did I never learn pig latin???
wrote:
DeafAngel, you make perfect sense, and I too am glad that they monitored you constantly. I don't think it would be as fun here without you!
Privacy is a priviledge, not a right, and if it means saving someone's life, their privacy SHOULD be revoked. I'd rather someone be alive and humiliated than dead to protect their "dignity"...
wrote:
I have to agree with Bri, the symmetry is fantastic, Motts.
wrote:
Jack-o-lantern?
I'm not seein' it
wrote:
Welcome to Silent Hill, Motts.
wrote:
here is what you need http://www.buyaduck.com/dukws.html
wrote:
War is a great way to describe it. It actually looks like post World War II.
wrote:
I have now read through the articles that Lynne provided. The articles, generally speaking, affirmed that ECT treatments provided beneficial results to the patients that received them, that the effects were temporary and that there were some negative side effects associated with the treatments. There was also an acknowledgement that there was a lack of studies regarding the long term effects of continued application of ECT.

Among the negative side effects mentioned were short term memory loss and a temporary impairment to learn new things (no examples were given. Inability to learn a new skill? Inability to learn new knowledge?? These are two different types of learning. There was no clarification on this point).

For anyone who wishes to read the articles on their own I would describe them as brief and reasonably easy for non-health pros to read with the exception of the Cochrane technical review. In the Cochrane technical review the main results section was harder to follow. However the intro and conclusions were easy to understand.

Registration at Medscape is free.

I will also state that I neither support nor oppose ECT usage (more info would be required to form a conclusion). I am only summarizing the articles as I understood them.
Oh, Lynne. If you look closely I am sure you will recognize someone!
wrote:
The historical side is brilliant. The techical commentarys wonderful..the ohotographs ,fantastic...and the criticism.unwarranted as these are a mans personal views..not finacially driven expose
wrote:
I have to disagree its far more credible that these old vessels should spend their retirement in each others company rather baeen reduced to razor blades. While the ships and boats still lie here the memories are still quiet vivid...When they are gone..they die...and we tend to forget. I equate ships with living things..they are born the live ..they trans form they grow old..they retire and die. Some of these ain't ready to die yet.
wrote:
Go on open it..you know you want to!

You won't be happy till you know whats inside......
wrote:
Hass the appearance of some type of warship..given the bullring on the bow...the formal standing jack staff..and the Fairleads further along the focs'le.
Magnificent photo. Its really can be any ship we want it to be.
wrote:
Have a look and see how they break ships in India and the far east. People power like an army of ants crawling ,cutting,hacking,and all the time the great beast is dying...