Comments

wrote:
Oh, I KNOW it was a doodad, but let me ask you this: might they have possibly used it as a thingamawhobber at the same time?
wrote:
I wonder what those "x"-'s mean. Did there seem to be any pattern as to how they were placed?
wrote:
Motts, you're like the mac daddy of perspective shots!
wrote:
Ka-ching!
wrote:
Deep thoughts with GirlJaye... check out how all of the little bolts at the bottom of the bannister are screwed in to the exact same angle.
wrote:
Wow... The broken glass on the white door looks as if it forms a small, ghastly figure that looks like it is screaming.
wrote:
This place must've been incredible in its heyday. It's still incredible.
wrote:
Awesome contrasts - in color, texture, and subject.
wrote:
I agree GirlJaye....the ceiling is beautiful! Especially the way they incorporated the skylights into the architecture. The peeling paint, decay, and green taking over inside are extra bonuses...
wrote:
could be whats left of an umbrella holder or some strange english doodad.
wrote:
See! Dropped ceiling covering up what could be something different & interesting. This was on its way to becoming an antiseptic tube long ago =( It's like the building has now dropped its antiseptic tube pants and is running for freedom! I'm not sure what that means... What did I just say?!
wrote:
its probably just missing its 2 other doors.
wrote:
Was there a fire in this part of the building? The upper walls and ceiling leading into the gaping maw look kind of sooty. Even the lines left by condensation on the walls look sooty.
wrote:
Ahhhh...the long hallway shot! And THIS one with the addition of beautiful red lights!!
wrote:
i bet they had a in and out and you can see on the left side its like a different landing to some stairs, it does look odd the door is not in line with the arch.