Comments

wrote:
omg yes Lynne i see the 'ghost' too, that just made this shot even cooler! love all the colours here.
wrote:
Patrick, thanks for the link to the inside pictures. They are great. I think I am completely spoiled by Motts now though. As I looked through them I couldn't help thinking, "I wish Motts had been able to go in. His pictures would be so much better."
wrote:
I agree. Fantastic!
that lantern in the distance is great. it looks like a fire or an explosion roaring in.
wrote:
Come again?
wrote:
The tunnels varied in height from about 7 to 9 feet; it wasn't claustrophobic but I'm sure it would have been after a day or so of hiding in there, or if it was full of people and supplies.
wrote:
As always sir, superb! Though the way your narrative makes it sound, I'd have never made it past the entrance ~ Claustrophobic
wrote:
Fabulous work Motts.
wrote:
Who...? :-p
wrote:
Maybe it's just my being half asleep at the moment, but your head/face looks kind of creepy with the lighting and the movement.
And I also think this could be a great wallpaper.
wrote:
Really The Way They Treated Those People Back Then Was Actually The Way U Would Treat A Piece Of Dirt Three Words To Sum It Out "It Was Inhumaine!
wrote:
nice shot :)
wrote:
hey, Scottbaker.eu, i greatly dislike you at this moment in time. WHY would you not let ME be the first to say that? anywho... let me be the next!!

lynneeeeee ITS A TORTURE DEVICE. I SHALL PUT YOU ON IT AND TORTURE YOU WITH THE COFEEMAKER!!! muahahaha *runs away*
wrote:
i can just imagine a worker in dark coveralls, a old looking construction helmet, and a clipboard moving up and down this checking things off on his clipboard. great!

(oh yeah... i seem to see things in places and pictures that people dont... people walking by the side of the road, a dog crossing the road.... and none of it is really there but it looks so real to me, i might see ghosts, but thats how i saw the worker here ;) ill say it again: great!)
wrote:
Loved this set Motts, thank you!