101 Comments Posted by AngelWolf

wrote:
the door beckons....
wrote:
YIKES!
wrote:
how in the world do you navigate places like this, motts??? amazing!
wrote:
this reminds me of a dream i had once many, many years ago. simply stunning! i can't tear myself away from this picture. spectacular job, motts!
wrote:
well, two of the jars ARE empty. hmmmmmm....

(j/k) :)
wrote:
eerie. i love the wooden cabinets on the freezer doors. makes the morgue seem more "homey", doesn't it?
wrote:
so serene and picturesque even though the shot is chopped in half. i can see where you might have been loathe, though, to omit either part of the sky or part of the landscape, eh, motts? if you take away half of the sky you could make some pretty nifty x-mas cards out of this one.
wrote:
oh my....

he has a cute little head, but he DOES look like he's missing a catheter on the other end. o_O
wrote:
LOL, clumsy chair looks like it was just moseying along, minding it's own business and then, WHUMP!, it tripped over and fell flat on it's face. i hope it isn't hurt. XD
wrote:
you're right. it reeks of innuendo. and i love it!

lynn, i'm still grinning at your "formication" comment. with a mindset like that, how can you go wrong?

the picture would have been fairly unremarkable if it hadn't been for the "hard" rivetted at the bottom. what an exceptional find! the last word sort of looks different, almost as if it were an afterthought. i've never seen any sign like it!

yep, it's the addition of the last word that makes every word suddenly seem risque, LOL! hehe.

i bet you cracked up when you saw it, eh, motts? i want a sign like that....
wrote:
formication, LOL! XD
wrote:
oh goodie! new pics!

this one is great! i love the effects! it looks very "unreal".

thank s, MOTTS!
wrote:
eric, it takes a special kind of person to appreciate the beauty in the mundane, but, imo, this is the furthest thing from it. it takes a thoughtful (and, i daresay, reasonably intelligent)person to appreciate a forgotten history, the story of a life far different from one's own. and it takes a true artist, like motts, to be able to combine the 2 in such a dramatic and compelling way. but i wouldn't expect someone like you to understand that concept, so i apologize if my rationale is beyond your comprehension. i really should know better than to always expect civilized behavior , but i'm still so invariably taken by surprise. i do not normally surround myself with people of your particular caliber or mind set, so i am unable to understand your inability to appreciate the nature of this medium, the detail to composition (yes, these aren't merely snapshots, there is an art to taking a good picture, haven't you ever admired ansel adams' work? or is that beyond your scope of creativity and the appreciation thereof?), or your blatant contempt for something that you, frankly, have no concept. if you can't tell the difference between "patronising" (sic) and genuine regard and appreciation, i suggest you look it up. also a course in human behavior (along with a class in etiquette!) might not be such a bad idea. why in the world would ANYONE waste their time on a web site just to patronize someone we don't even know??? hello!?! think about it.
~a~
wrote:
so long, red dye #2.

woops, did i say that out loud?

it's what the picture reminds me of.

it just popped in my head as soon as i clicked on it. i guess it's because it's so RED, in the rubbish, forgotten, it looks so unnatural, so anomalous, so died, er, dyed. it's like this is where the scare of red dye #2 ended up along with itself.

or is it just the ramblings of a warped mind?
wrote:
this theater looks like it was inspired by escher, or vice versa.