wrote:
Good point Nina!

A little underlighting can make just about anything look spookier.
wrote:
Great title for this shot!
I'd design the entry of a house like this.
wrote:
I'd say cafeteria too, "meat" kinda gives it away. VERY nice macro Motts.
WHY do people put clothing on dogs? (unless you actually live where it's 30 below, maybe, and your dog has his/her own outdoor gear). Sorry, random thought just slipped out there.....
wrote:
Good gawd we had something similar in junior high.

Yes, I'm old. :p
wrote:
Wow those are deep seats! If I sat on that my short legs would stick straight out. LOL
Thanks for mentioning that it was empty :-). There's NO way I could have seen this and NOT looked inside if it was unlocked.....;-)
Hmmm. Interesting that in such a damp, moldy place, there would be enough of a lack of moisture to dry the cat out, instead of having it mold/rot as would be expected. Physics.
wrote:
Now THAT is my favourite so far. The colours!!!
wrote:
Holy crap that's one helluva shot Motts! It doesn't get more perfect than that, the "x" is almost too good to be real. And I really like the softness of the light in the rooms on both sides.
Great shot, Motts. Images like this always sort of "virtually populate" the places for me. Discarded or forgotten mundane, everyday personal items always add a distinctive, "actual human" element, and help to remind us that this was "home" for someone long gone.
wrote:
Wow I love the sun on the wall, it's super bright!
Purtysouthern--Geez!! Yep. I agree. Those Teddy Ruxpin things were horrible!!. Guess I'm just not into dolls that move/talk. It's just not RIGHT!! (shudder)....Dolls alone (especially clown dolls) are bad enough!!!
wrote:
Beauty shot! The colours and shadows are perfect.