Comments

wrote:
Throwing this out there for anyone because I have never studied infants in regards to mental institutions. Were babies sent here because they parents couldn't take care of them? Was it more of an "adoption process?" I don't see any foreseeable factors that could be used to diagnose a child that young with any sort of detrimental mental condition that would warrant admittance to a hospital. I don't know - someone help me out?
wrote:
Is the large building on the left hand side a unrelated building? Or is it still part of the hospital. It looks really close to the complex - hence my question. Great shot.
wrote:
Hope that stuff wasn't important!
wrote:
@blackrose-Your parents made the right decision to keep you-God Bless them! I'm glad you survived and hope you're doing well. : )
wrote:
The room looks spacious - there doesn't seem to be any logical reason for its placement unless there was severer overcrowding. Its difficult to tell, but it seems an odd placement for a crib given all the space available.
wrote:
TootUncommon - Well Done :)
wrote:
I love the colors here
wrote:
It's so barren- makes me feel lonely looking at it. I cant imagine what it was like to actually "live" in here.
wrote:
Again, another very sad shot of a baby crib. How could a baby so young be institutionalized. : ( I would keep the baby no matter what!
wrote:
This picture cuts to the very core of my heart...that poor baby! I love ALL babies-that's why I'm pro-life.
wrote:
Those chairs are in good shape-they should be reused.
wrote:
New gallery! HAPPINESS!
Morgue! HAPPINESS!!

Love the colours.
House, lol I can see where you got the user name. I love watching House on Monday nights!!

Motts, I have to say like this sign as well and for it to be left out in plain sight like that is awesome! Nice shot!!
wrote:
Thanks so much for another great gallery of thought -provoking photos! Always a pleasure to get to see what you see! :)
wrote:
Yes, i agree Minkus! lol