935 Comments Posted by Silkster40z

wrote:
we need to ask motts for the correct technical model numbering is. This will solve the Dohickie, thingamajig, and whatchmacallit issue. But lets not get too technical with this as it would open an entire new book of ... ..... errrrrrr........ummm........ WHATCHMACALLITS!
lol
wrote:
Love the color, this is a very cool picture!
wrote:
Shannon, are you a therapist?
wrote:
That too!
wrote:
yes, it is.... I do often wonder if the type of monitor people use plays a role in how things are viewed on here, to me the face is very clear. :-)
wrote:
Martymizuno, yup!
wrote:
Twug, now look at the very last window pane on the bottom right and see the guy looking through the glass staring right at the camera???
wrote:
Lynne, ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Does the Beam Machine come in a more compact size? I'd like one of those but that one seems quite large and apparently takes some of the flooring with it..... What do you do with then extra flooring when you land? =8-0
wrote:
Lynne,
After all the yellow liquid was drained and put in those jars they leave lying around, it would probably weigh a lot less.....
wrote:
Did this serve the entire complex?
wrote:
"whatchamacallit" is a blanket term used only when its a model - TD 78 13 or higher..... anything under that would technically be a Thingamajig.... Dohickie can be used for anthing else =8-)
wrote:
if thats a serious invite..... i would love to see the place !!
wrote:
makes me wonder.... motts did you putll the handle on that? I dont think I could have resisted, but then again, if it did work, the alarm sound would probably level the building!
wrote:
Hey Lynn,
whats the chances of you getting ~Me and I a tour of your building..... after the tour, I can leave and and leave ~Me there ......
wrote:
Didn't Mots tell you guys he freelances as a tight rope walker in his spare time?