206 Comments Posted by Kadee

wrote:
This must have been absolutely gorgeous when it was new.
wrote:
Beautiful
wrote:
Love the angle of this shot
wrote:
WOW what a way to start the set. Nice
wrote:
I hope your source is 100% right Big Ed, would hate to see this beauty go too.
wrote:
Dorbrite you make a very good point from the construction point of view.
But don't you think it a shame that some of this beautiful historical architecture from the past may not be around much longer for future generations to enjoy and admire? Structures like this are not built anymore, shouldn't it be preserved to keep a part history alive to enjoy and look back on. I'm all for progress, but I am also for preserving the beauty of the past when it can be. My husband is in the demo field and tells me all the time that many of these old structures can very easily be renovated and preserved without altering the originality of them or costing a small fortune.
wrote:
oops , I should have read further into the comments. I thought you meant the building not Kirkbride Hall.
wrote:
There is a few GirlJaye, check out this site
http://www.kirkbridebuildings.com/

most everything you could want to know on Kirkbrides
wrote:
that's nice MD extreme. I'm sure your mother is very proud of you
wrote:
If all the door hinges were taken I would imagine it was for salvage and resale, things like these are a hot ticket item in the shaby chic world
wrote:
AutumTwins I was thinking some sort of windows too, but they look a little thick, maybe shadows?
wrote:
Oops, I forgot about them. Still tempting though........
wrote:
The thing that may be a head to the multi legged mechanical beastie looks like it might be a barrel, but the other thing in front hmmm .....
wrote:
Motts after you took the picture did you run down the hallway with your arm out and slam all the doors. I would have , wouldn't have been able to resist just for the echo -lol
wrote:
Thanks for another gorgeous gallery Motts