515 Comments Posted by Darlene

wrote:
I'm not Catholic, but I think that canon law stipulates that religious vessels are not to be left behind, since they are considered sacred. In particular, this would be the case with a tabernacle, having held the Blessed Sacrament.
wrote:
Just when I was going to say "no graffiti in this one." And then I looked more closely. Why must they ruin those beautiful wood doors?
wrote:
This statue isn't so bad. I think that might be a young David when he was a shepherd, before he became King of Israel.
wrote:
Dark-Star, I wouldn't be surprised if there was anti-Christian motivation behind the destruction of the statues. Perhaps it was done by an ex-Catholic with a chip on their shoulder.
wrote:
I'm not fond of the statues myself. We Eastern Orthodox don't have them in our churches. This one is especially unattractive.
wrote:
That coin slot looks rather small - like you can't fit much through there.
wrote:
So much in this photo I don't like. And that 70's era chair definitely does not go with the organ. Why or why do they leave these beautiful instruments behind?
wrote:
I agree, Beth. This graffiti is so out of place here.
wrote:
Flushed & Sandy - I don't think all Catholic churches have donation boxes. The ones I have been to don't.
wrote:
That graffiti and broken window look awful - I agree, Dark-Star, totally a mood breaker.
wrote:
And there sits the lone chair.
wrote:
What are the items in the foreground? They don't fit in with the rest of the photo.
wrote:
So pretty, slate blue walls and light green floor. I wonder what was in those arches that are on the wall. Perhaps religious drawings.
wrote:
One thing for sure...those flowers aren't real.
wrote:
I agree, this is quite the graffiti!